Talk:Inclusive design

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 January 2022 and 18 March 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ElmerB23, AlphaBetta, HYang2024 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Charlottespohler, MollyPribble, Carlikelley.

The language of the article needs to be de-jargonised. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:39, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Inclusive vs Universal design I don't think that inclusive design and universal design are the same. Where inclusive design is seen as a method for designing one solution for one individual (usually for someone that has special needs). Design for All or Universal Design takes into account a wide variety of needs so that everyone (with whatever ability can use it). Inclusive design is popular in the field of UX/interaction design, to make digital interfaces more accessible for specific user needs; usually, by solving someone's needs really good, it is easier to use for everyone. Design for all is more an attribute mostly used in construction and infrastructure. You could use inclusive design methods to reach to a better Universal Design. 2A01:110:8012:1012:187D:F390:8655:CED9 (talk) 11:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wrong definition[edit]

The given definition corresponds to Universal design, not inclusive design. Universal design -> one size fits all, Inclusive design -> one size fits one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:700:300:17BB:39A2:F5A5:65F0:9BB5 (talk) 12:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editing Content[edit]

I'm planning on editing parts of the "Examples of inclusive design - Interfaces and technology" section by creating a separate area for the "Assistive clothing" paragraph and adding sources. Student4545 (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]