Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanooki Mario

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect - important information is already in Super Mario Bros. 3. CDC (talk) 21:10, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Tanooki Mario

A page about a transformation of Mario. Fancruft and beyond! A Link to the Past 01:10, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Redirect, no merge. A condensed version of the information in this article is already present in Super Mario Bros. 3; I would have suggested a merge if it weren't. (Change vote; that's what I meant in the first place.) AиDя01DTALK 21:59, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but make sure all accurate information is present in Super Mario Bros. 3--Absurdist 02:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Mario is perhaps one of the most notable video game characters ever, so no, a transformation of Mario would not be "fancruft". If the consensus starts to lean towards delete, I will change my vote to merge with Mario and Super Mario Bros. 3. But if it doesn't, I'll still be voting keep. Revolución 03:29, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • HUGE flaw in that - you're arguing that a variation of Mario deserves its article because the transformation is of a popular character. Well, go make an article about Mario's Hammer. I'll be there to recommend it for a Speedy Deletion. -- A Link to the Past 03:02, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Super Mario Bros. 3 and include a section in that article about Mario's various suits that appear only in that game. (This would include not only the Tanooki, but Frog and Hammer suits as well.) Firebug 05:18, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, duplicate content, cruft. Megan1967 06:34, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Super Mario Bros. 3. the wub (talk) 07:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Super Mario Bros. 3 by expanding the small section about the Tanooki suit. Sjakkalle 10:57, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • On second thought the info in the SMB3 article is more concise and better, so just redirect. Sjakkalle 09:38, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Super Mario Bros. 3. --bainer 12:06, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect as above. --InShaneee 17:55, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Do NOT Merge this. The SMB3 page already has this information, condensed. -- A Link to the Past 19:01, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Super Mario Bros. 3. No merge, as this is already covered by the article. --Carnildo 21:16, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, no need for breakout. I'd agree with Link to the past that the SMB3 page deals with this adequately, and more consisely, without losing anything but unneeded wordyness. Sabine's Sunbird 01:03, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Super Mario Bros. 3. --metta, The Sunborn 03:36, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Super Mario Bros. 3. Andre (talk) 00:37, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.