Jump to content

Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBeauty and the Beast (1991 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 31, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
July 14, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
March 19, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
April 12, 2014Good article nomineeListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 29, 2021, September 29, 2021, and September 29, 2022.
Current status: Good article

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation[edit]

@Poirot09: I don't understand why you reverted my DAB. I wasn't identifying which of the 25 stand-alone articles titled Beauty and the Beast (xxxxx) this one is, since as you noted, the note in parentheses specifies which it is, but to help the reader find the article they're looking for. I.e. "Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be," per WP:DAB. YoPienso (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yopienso Explained at WP:DABLINKUG. Poirot09 (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Poirot09 Thank you. But I still don't understand. WP:DABLINKUG says, For example, Treaty of Paris (1796) should include a hatnote pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Paris (disambiguation). We have exactly the same situation with movies titled Beauty and the Beast: Beauty and the Beast (1934 film), Beauty and the Beast (1946 film), Beauty and the Beast (1962 film), Beauty and the Beast (1978 film), Beauty and the Beast (1983 film), Beauty and the Beast (1987 film), Beauty and the Beast (1991 film), Beauty and the Beast (1996 film), Beauty and the Beast (1997 film), Beauty and the Beast (2005 film), Beauty and the Beast (2009 film), Beauty and the Beast (2014 film), and Beauty and the Beast (2017 film). Best, YoPienso (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yopienso Read the following sentence: "For example, Mirror (1975 film) is clearly about one specific movie and not about any of the many other meanings of "Mirror", and most users will know to type Mirror in the search box to find other topics." Poirot09 (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for the delay in responding. Real life suddenly became busy and I can't really spend time on this discussion.
I believe you're editing in good faith and are trying to be collegial with me. I've found your terse comments difficult to understand, though. YoPienso (talk) 13:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section[edit]

According to WP:LEADSECTION, it should contain "no more than four well-composed paragraphs" as a rule of thumb. In this article, however, the lead section is currently six paragraphs. Given that, should we consider trimming it down? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]